Search This Blog

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Disarms Himself and Notifies the Sheriff


And In Texas There is movement to Disarm Ourselves Because of Police Swatting Which Puts Those That Live In Rural America At Risk 

Current Events

New York Mall Shootings
http://www.newsmax.com/TheWire/ny-mall-lock-down/2013/09/26/id/527767

Can I Bring My Guns Back To The Farm?


If Your Not Rich And Live In
Texas It Is Not Your Fault
RICO Act ViolationsA Republican Principle That Is Not Live-Up To by Congress
The Texas Tea Party Is Communism  

09/26/2013: I Need a Call from Congressman Cuellar Caseworker Office That Should of Been On Day One and he needs to say  
"I am still working your Case. I will Get Back with You on This Date Xxxxxx. You Need Not Send Me Any more Information. We Have All on File Including docs sent to Pete Gallegos Office" 

Dear [Congressman Cuellar] Henry,

As you know, I support gun safety and live a farm. I have been swatted by the police 2 times, which are a matter of the justice department; they have responded and looking into my complaints.  To protect myself and family, we made a decision to remove all weapons from farm, because of the high risk of being a political target, or targets based on disability and religious minorities.  Please read and publish as you please, if it gives you example my story “Can I bring my guns back to the farm.” At this link: http://tsmfi.blogspot.com/2012/09/can-i-bring-my-guns-back-to-farm.html

“The President made clear that this is a complex issue, and that solutions must be wide-ranging and include everything from access to mental health services to confronting a culture that at times glorifies violence.”

I agree with President Proposal; however, let me make it clear “All Disabled Persons Are Considered To Have A Mental Disorder” and “All Persons Receiving Psychological Treatment Are Considered Unworthy of Owning Self Protection.”  

Lastly, “Persons deemed incapable of handling their own finances are deemed to unworthy of owning weapons.” These statements are all logically invalid; especially the last, which would mean all congressional members, and the Department of Defense would ineligible to own weapons, be in charge of any weapons, or use weapons for self-protection or national defense!

Another example that I suggest that you pass on to the Dallas Office of Civil Rights or publish as your please, the problem, of segregating  and labeling “Disabled” and “Disabled Students” with a mental illness, created a very bad problem in Texas as follows: 


The Economic Depression Increases The Mortality Rate
Including Shootings and Suicides
This is a well thought out Alternative Probably The Only
Well Thought Out Alternative
You Tried Everything Else Why Not -
 Tejas the 51st
State of United States of America
Just One Example


Username: fred6367
Password: d7c1c77
http://03530.com/wp-login.php
This public statement on the Gov Reg. page means all students with disabilities will be targeted by unofficial staff breaches. Please reconsider the proposed clarification rules in reference to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act as it relates to the disabled student population at colleges and universities in Texas and across America. There are two agendas promoted by the consortium of higher education known as NCHERM with memberships greater than 500 colleges and university across America: 1. Campus Violence 2. Financial liability. These issues must be addressed separately or dire consequences will result from the push to reduce financial risk by deregulation of privacy laws under the guise to end violent acts on campus. Disabled students may have already been targeted as liability risk by the same law enforcement tool used to identity disturbed students in order to prevent 
occurrences such as the “tragic events at Virginia Tech in April 2007.” 

The behavior assessment system CUBASS, incorporated on every campus to end violence would benefit most from the purposed deregulation. The privacy rule changes specifically relating to campus safety should go forward immediately. Using the 911 Patriot Act to deregulate privacy laws for campus safety, is a necessary evil, an irritation of privacy for the better good and protection of students. Unfortunately, the medical records of stable students identified on campus disabilities rosters may already been targeted for compromise by “unauthorized access by school officials” solely for financial risk management. The disabled student population is the only minority group segregated and identified on official state rosters and therefore subjects of discrimination by the purposed regulation. The areas of comprise are not limited to, Misrepresentation of Medical records, Mistreatment of the disabled third party business, Denied Access to programs, Reduction in financial aid, Harassment by misguided faculty and staff, Discrimination by campus police, Medical breaches under the guise of academic research.

Could it be that some of the most recent campus unrest could be contributed to mandatory state and university staff instructions which do not address ways to stop or reduce discrimination/ harassment but identifies any student with a legidament ADA disability grievance as a dangerous violent threat? NCHERM is promoting web training in the same context of campus violence and repeatedly uses the same push used as background information by the Department of Education for privacy deregulation; Background “… in light of the tragic events at Virginia Tech in April 2007.” NCHERM promotional ad seems to mix the Virginia Tech tragedy in context of ADA grievances filed by sane intelligent students who by last resort made a plea for help from government agencies, “Since the massacre at Virginia Tech last April, we at NCHERM have grappled with two questions. First, should colleges and universities be in the business of behavioral intervention?” Filing a ligament ADA grievance is not the business of 'Behavioral Intervention' especially if it is used as a financial risk management tool! Please reconsider the dire consequences of regulation changes proposed by

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 34 CFR Part 99 RIN 1855-AA05 Docket ID ED-2008-OPEPD-0002 Family Educational Rights and Privacy
Publish as examples as you please, you may use my name or not, up to you.


Whose Blog is it anyways gno 09/26/2013



Post a Comment